Metabolic Control

Sub-Areas to Metabolic Control:

Traditional Medicine (1)


(Journal Article): Genital infections among girls with type 1 diabetes
 
[No indication of authors]
 
IN: Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 2004; 43(4):21-25

ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to investigate the relation between genital infections (frequency, etiology, clinical presentation) among girls with type 1 diabetes and some factors as age of the girls, duration and metabolic control of diabetes. Forty-three girls with type 1 diabetes and twelve healthy girls for controls were involved in the study. Methods used are: genital tract inspection, direct microscopy and cultures from genital discharge and urine. Glycaemic control in the diabetic girls was assessed by measuring total glycosylated haemoglobin. The results show vulvovaginal candidiasis in 27 (62.8%) in diabetic girls versus 2 (16.6%) in controls (p < 0.01). There was clear prevalence of non-albicans Candida species. Concomitant infection with bacterial pathogens were proved in only 6 (13.9%) of diabetic girls and 1 (8.5%) of the controls. The clinical presentation of genital candidiasis was vulvovaginitis and most of the affected diabetic girls (88.9%) were in puberty period. There was no relation between duration and metabolic control of diabetes and genital infections.



 
Respond on this Journal Article!
Hint: Your Response should directly apply to Genital infections among girls with type 1 diabetes. Please check, if this context applies best to your contribution. Otherwise click HERE to change to the appropriate subject area. The actual subject area is Metabolic Control.

 

(Journal Article): Glycaemic control in a type 1 diabetes clinic for younger adults
 
Saunders SA, Wallymahmed M, MacFarlane IA (University Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Clinical Sciences Centre, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool L9 7AL, United Kingdom, simon@simple5.freeserve.co.uk )
 
IN: QJM 2004; 97(9):575-580
Impact Factor(s) of QJM: 2.58 (2004), 2.395 (2003), 2.601 (2001)

Fulltext:    HTML 

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT, 1993) tight diabetes control (HbA1c <7%) was associated with significantly less microvascular complications compared to 'conventionally' treated type 1 patients. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of a dedicated young-adult type 1 diabetes clinic in achieving HbA1c levels <7% between 1991 and 2001. DESIGN: Retrospective review of case-notes. METHODS: All patients who attended the clinic in the first six years (1991 to 1996) were studied. All were offered at least two appointments per year. Case-notes were reviewed up to December 2001. RESULTS: We treated 386 type 1 patients (59.8% male, mean age 28.7 years, mean duration diabetes 9.5 years). After a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, 261 (67.6%) had attended in the past 2 years, 22 (5.8%) were known to have died, 11 (2.8%) had transferred to another clinic and 92 (23.8%) had repeatedly failed to attend appointments for 2 years. Over 11 years, the total mean (SD) HbA1c was 9.19% (1.3). Only 3.4% of patients achieved an average HbA1c of <7% during the study period, and 80% of patients had average HbA1c levels of >8%. DISCUSSION: Despite regular specialist physician, specialist diabetes nurse and dietician input, encouragement of multiple daily insulin injections and repeatedly following-up failed appointments (including home visits), fewer than 1:20 patients achieved the DCCT target of mean HbA1c <7%. Tight diabetes control is rare in a routine clinic setting.



 
Respond on this Journal Article!
Hint: Your Response should directly apply to Glycaemic control in a type 1 diabetes clinic for younger adults. Please check, if this context applies best to your contribution. Otherwise click HERE to change to the appropriate subject area. The actual subject area is Metabolic Control.

 

(Journal Article): Lens fluorescence and metabolic control in type 1 diabetic patients: a 14 year follow up study
 
Kessel L, Sander B, Dalgaard P, Larsen M (Department of Ophthalmology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark, line.kessel@dadlnet.dk )
 
IN: Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88(9):1169-1172
Impact Factor(s) of Br J Ophthalmol: 2.0 (2004), 2.099 (2003), 1.942 (2001)

Fulltext:    HTML 

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND/AIMS: In this prospective study the authors followed the post-translational modification of the proteins of the lens of the eye by fluorometry over a period of 14 years in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Twenty patients were examined at 6 years (baseline) and 20 years (follow up) after onset of diabetes mellitus. Glycaemic levels were assessed from HbA1c measured at regular intervals from the onset of diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: Lens fluorescence at follow up was significantly related to mean HbA1c during the study period and to lens fluorescence at baseline (p<0.0001). Sixty per cent of the variation in rate of increase in lens fluorescence during the study period was statistically attributable to glycaemia levels. CONCLUSION: The results confirm that the rate of fluorophore accumulation in the lens of adult diabetic patients is increased in proportion to glycaemic control. This parameter alone is, however, not sufficient to explain the entire variation in lens fluorophore accumulation. Consequently, lens fluorescence must be influenced by other factors before initiation and during the study period, and possibly even before onset of diabetes mellitus. The underlying mechanism could be a variation in susceptibility to lens protein denaturation by glycation.



 
Respond on this Journal Article!
Hint: Your Response should directly apply to Lens fluorescence and metabolic control in type 1 diabetic patients: a 14 year follow up study. Please check, if this context applies best to your contribution. Otherwise click HERE to change to the appropriate subject area. The actual subject area is Metabolic Control.

 

(Journal Article): "Low Dose" Metformin Improves Hyperglycemia Better Than Acarbose in Type 2 Diabetics
 
Yajima K, Shimada A, Hirose H, Kasuga A, Saruta T (Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan, asmd(at)st.itc.keio.ac.jp )
 
IN: Rev Diabetic Stud 2004; 1(2):89-94
Impact Factor(s) of Rev Diabetic Stud: 0.125 (2006)

Fulltext:    HTML  PDF

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: "High dose" metformin therapy (2,550 mg/day) is reported to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with obesity (body mass index (BMI) >= 30). Some have reported that metformin therapy, even in low doses (500-750 mg/day), improves glycemic control in non-obese type 2 diabetic patients (BMI approximately 25). However, it is unclear whether "low dose" metformin improves glycemic control better than acarbose in non-obese type 2 diabetic patients, which has been shown to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes with obesity. METHODS: We randomly divided 22 non-obese type 2 diabetic patients (mean BMI approximately 25) into two groups (A=11, B=11). Group A was treated with "low dose" metformin (500-750 mg/day) for 3 months, and switched to acarbose (150-300 mg/day) for another 3 months. Group B was treated with acarbose first, and then switched to "low dose" metformin. RESULTS: "Low dose" metformin significantly decreased the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c level in both groups A and B, whereas acarbose decreased HbA1c levels in group B but not in group A. Overall, "low dose" metformin significantly decreased HbA1c (p=0.0165) levels as compared to acarbose. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, "low dose" metformin therapy improved glycemic control better than acarbose in non-obese diabetics.

TYPE OF PUBLICATION: Original article

REFERENCES:

  1. Coniff RF, Shapiro JA, Seaton TB. Long-term efficacy and safety of acarbose in the treatment of obese subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 1994. 154:2442-2448.
  2. Feinglos MN, Bethel MA. Oral agent therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999. 22 Suppl 3:C61-64.
  3. Wolever TM, Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Hunt JA, Palmason C, Rodger NW, Ross SA, Ryan EA, Tan MH. Small weight loss on long-term acarbose therapy with no change in dietary pattern or nutrient intake of individuals with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997. 21(9):756-763.
  4. Sangiorgio L, Attardo T, Condorelli L, Lunetta M. Effects of the treatment with acarbose in elderly overweight type 2 diabetic patients in poor glycemic control with oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2000. 31(1):27-34.
  5. DeFronzo RA, Goodman AM. Efficacy of metformin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Multicenter Metformin Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995. 333(9):541-549.
  6. Davidson MB, Peters AL. An overview of metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 1997. 102(1):99-110.
  7. Holman RR, Cull CA, Turner RC. A randomized double-blind trial of acarbose in type 2 diabetes shows improved glycemic control over 3 years (U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 44). Diabetes Care 1999. 22(6):960-964.
  8. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998. 352(9131):854-865.
  9. Espinosa Campos J. Metformin's effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with secondary failure to sulfonylureas. Diabetes Care 1996. 19(11):1185-1189.
  10. Yamakido M. Incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and its risk factors in Japanese-Americans living in Hawaii and Los Angeles. Diabet Med 1996. 13(9 Suppl 6):S133-142.
  11. Garber AJ, Duncan TG, Goodman AM, Mills DJ, Rohlf JL. Efficacy of metformin in type II diabetes: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial. Am J Med 1997. 103(6):491-497.
  12. Ohmura C, Tanaka Y, Mitsuhashi N, Atsumi Y, Matsuoka K, Onuma T, Kawamori R. Efficacy of low-dose metformin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Current therapeutic research 1998. 59(12):889-895.
  13. Johansen K. Acarbose treatment of sulfonylurea-treated non-insulin dependent diabetics. A double-blind cross-over comparison of an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor with metformin.. Diabete Metab 1984. 10(4):219-223.
  14. Inzucchi SE, Maggs DG, Spollett GR, Page SL, Rife FS, Walton V, Shulman GI. Efficacy and metabolic effects of metformin and troglitazone in type II diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1998. 338(13):867-872.
  15. Moller DE. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action. J Clin Invest 2001. 108(8):1167-1174.
  16. Giugliano D, De Rosa N, Di Maro G, Marfella R, Acampora R, Buoninconti R, D'Onofrio F. Metformin improves glucose, lipid metabolism, and reduces blood pressure in hypertensive, obese women. Diabetes Care 1993. 16(10):1387-1390.
  17. Giugliano D, Quatraro A, Consoli G, Minei A, Ceriello A, De Rosa N, D'Onofrio F. Metformin for obese, insulin-treated diabetic patients: improvement in glycaemic control and reduction of metabolic risk factors. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1993. 44(2):107-112.
  18. Vigneri R, Goldfine ID. Role of metformin in treatment of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1987. 10(1):118-122.
  19. Fedele D, Tiengo A, Nosadini R, Marchiori E, Briani G, Garotti MC, Muggeo M. Hypolipidemic effects of metformin in hyperprebetalipoproteinemia. Diabete Metab 1976. 2(3):127-133.
  20. Rains SG, Wilson GA, Richmond W, Elkeles RS. The effect of glibenclamide and metformin on serum lipoproteins in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 1988. 5(7):653-658.
  21. Nagi DK, Yudkin JS. Effects of metformin on insulin resistance, risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and plasminogen activator inhibitor in NIDDM subjects. A study of two ethnic groups. Diabetes Care 1993. 16(4):621-629.
  22. Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi G, Tomassetti S, Zoli M, Melchionda N. Metformin in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Lancet 2001. 358(9285):893-894.
  23. Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi G, Tomassetti S, Bugianesi E, Lenzi M, McCullough AJ, Natale S, Forlani G, Melchionda N. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a feature of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes 2001. 50(8):1844-1850.
  24. Marchesini G, Brizi M, Morselli Labate AM, Bianchi G, Bugianesi E, McCullough AJ, Forlani G, Melchionda N. Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with insulin resistance. Am J Med 1999. 107(5):450-455.
  25. Mertes G. Safety and efficacy of acarbose in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes: data from a 5-year surveillance study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2001. 52(3):193-204.
  26. Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Hunt JA, Palmason C, Rodger NW, Ross SA, Ryan EA, Tan MH, Wolever TM. The efficacy of acarbose in the treatment of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A multicenter controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1994. 121(12):928-935.
  27. Reaven GM, Lardinois CK, Greenfield MS, Schwartz HC, Vreman HJ. Effect of acarbose on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in NIDDM patients poorly controlled by sulfonylureas. Diabetes Care 1990. 13 Suppl 3:32-36.
  28. Yoshino G, Furukawa S, Hirano T, Naito H, Kazumi T, Urayama T. The minimum dose of acarbose suppresses triglyceride concentration in remnant-like particles from fasted diabetic subjects. Horm Metab Res 1996. 28(7):329-330.
  29. Leonhardt W, Hanefeld M, Fischer S, Schulze J. Efficacy of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors on lipids in NIDDM subjects with moderate hyperlipidaemia. Eur J Clin Invest 1994. 24 Suppl 3:45-49.
  30. Calle Pascual A, Garcia Honduvilla J, Martin Alvarez PJ, Calle JR, Maranes JP. Influence of 16-week monotherapy with acarbose on cardiovascular risk factors in obese subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a controlled, double-blind comparison study with placebo. Diabetes Metab 1996. 22(3):201-202.


 
Respond on this Journal Article!
Hint: Your Response should directly apply to "Low Dose" Metformin Improves Hyperglycemia Better Than Acarbose in Type 2 Diabetics. Please check, if this context applies best to your contribution. Otherwise click HERE to change to the appropriate subject area. The actual subject area is Metabolic Control.

 



 
Respond on this !
Hint: Your Response should directly apply to . Please check, if this context applies best to your contribution. Otherwise click HERE to change to the appropriate subject area. The actual subject area is Disease Management.